Anthropic's New Benchmark Changes Everything—Most People Will Miss Why

TLDR AI progress is accelerating on a super-exponential curve, with Opus 4.5 showing about 5 hours of human‑equivalent work at 50% and about 45.5 hours at 80%, and the pace roughly doubling every 4–4.5 months. By 2026 the game changes to defining, assigning, and managing work through AI agents—delegating tasks, coordinating multiple agents, and maintaining quality—rather than doing it all yourself. Deep domain expertise remains valuable, but the future of work centers on owning outcomes and building agent‑driven workflows across professions.

Grasp the super-exponential trajectory early

AI progress is accelerating on a super-exponential curve, not just linearly. Data points such as Opus 4.5 show human-equivalent work rising to roughly 5 hours at 50% progress and about 45.5 hours at 80%, a dramatic leap from earlier milestones. The pace appears to double roughly every 4 to 4.5 months, which means meaningful gains can compound quickly over the next year. Waiting for a traditional ‘AI quarter’ may leave you behind; the wise move is to plan with a 6–12 month horizon. The key implication is that early action compounds as AI agents become more capable.

Begin delegating work to AI agents now

Identify tasks that would take you a week to complete. Start framing those tasks as agent-enabled workflows you can delegate to AI. In a super-exponential environment, the value of learning to delegate grows as quickly as the technology itself. Those who start this in January–March will have a head start when progress accelerates later in the year.

Create a weekly agent-work loop with governance

Establish a simple weekly workflow where one or more agents handle a defined set of tasks and you provide a human review at key milestones. Set clear success metrics such as accuracy, turnaround time, and the usefulness of outputs. Use versioning, audit trails, and regular retrospectives to improve agent behavior over time. This governance lets you benefit from fast progress while maintaining accountability for quality.

Scale to two or three agents to gain compounding leverage

Once you can cover a week of work with an agent, add a second and then a third to amplify output. In a power-law world, small increases in team capability yield outsized gains, so your productivity can grow faster than linearly. Design orchestration where tasks flow between agents and humans, rather than relying on a single agent. This scalability puts you ahead of peers who wait for a later ‘AI quarter’ to start.

Build cross-functional skills and business fluency

Technical skills will spread across job families, and engineers will need business and customer fluency to architect agent-enabled systems. Learn to communicate goals, constraints, and acceptance criteria to agents and to non-technical teammates. Develop workflows that enable diverse contributors to participate and improve outcomes. The rise of longer-running agents will change how many professions work, making domain expertise still essential.

Adopt an outcome- and ownership-first career mindset for 2026

The future rewards those who own the work and steer it toward useful outcomes. By 2026, you’ll be asked to define, assign, and manage a week’s worth of agent-driven work, not just perform tasks yourself. Expect a surge of outputs and noise; you must judge which agent-produced results are meaningful and yield compounding value. Even in domains like law, deep domain knowledge remains valuable while agents handle repetitive tasks. Become an individual strategist who leads a team of agents to create a lasting competitive advantage.

What does the MER graph with PTR and TR indicate about AI progress trajectory?

PTR does not top out and TR has no upper bound, unlike benchmarks that saturate near 100%. This supports a super-exponential progress trajectory rather than a simple exponential one.

What does Opus 4.5 demonstrate in terms of human-equivalent work?

Opus 4.5 shows about 4 hours 45 minutes (nearly 5 hours) of human-equivalent work at 50%, and about 2728 minutes (roughly 45.5 hours) at 80%, a dramatic advance over earlier benchmarks.

How fast does this progress appear to double?

The pace appears to double roughly every 4 to 4.5 months.

What are the implications for work and productivity by 2026?

By 2026 you may be able to delegate a week’s worth of work to AI via agents; those who act in early months (January–March) will have a easy advantage, and the big question will be whether you can delegate a week’s work and let go of much of what you do now.

What is the self-reinforcing flywheel concept?

AI will increasingly train AI itself and automate more, speeding up progress with no apparent upper limit.

What skills will matter most in this super-exponential era?

The ability to define, assign, and manage work through agents; both technical and non-technical skills; business and customer fluency; domain expertise remains valuable as you lead agents to create value.

How will careers and job roles shift in this environment?

Work will be organized around outcomes and ownership; individuals become strategists who manage teams of agents, driving a compounding advantage across domains.

Will traditional career progression disappear?

Yes—traditional job-family thinking should be abandoned in favor of outcome- and ownership-obsessed work, with a much higher volume of agent-produced output to judge for usefulness and quality.

Will professions like law be replaced by AI agents?

Decades of experience remain valuable and some tasks will transform, but business understanding and domain expertise will still be critical; white-shoe law firms won’t be fully replaceable by non-lawyers.

Which players and models are driving progress beyond Claude?

Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT, and other model makers are driving progress, and similar exponential gains in agent-working time are expected from multiple players.

What is the focus of the 2025 debate?

Whether AI progress is on an exponential or super-exponential curve; current evidence points to the latter.

Summary of Timestamps

Related Summaries

Pyke + Concrete = Pycrete...

LeCun Said LLMs Are a Dead End—Then Revealed Meta F...

The While Loop That Killed Programming...

The Most Controversial Battery at CES 2026...

We need to talk about Ralph...

Doomberg Warns: Only These Will Protect You in 2026...