Menu

Summaries > AI > Ai > Best programming language for coding with AI agents | Peter Steinberger and Lex F...

Best Programming Language For Coding With Ai Agents | Peter Steinberger And Lex Fridman

TLDR iOS engineers should see themselves as builders who can apply their skills across various domains. Go is preferred for CLI tools due to its ecosystem, while Swift is used for Mac apps wanting better performance than Electron. Python is good for simple Windows tasks but can struggle with performance, making Rust a better choice for more demanding projects; ultimately, the choice of programming language depends on the problem at hand, and developers can adapt and learn as needed.

Key Insights

Shift Your Mindset

Transitioning from seeing yourself merely as an iOS engineer to recognizing your role as a builder is crucial. This mindset allows you to apply your skills beyond the confines of iOS development. Embracing this broad perspective empowers you to explore new domains and technologies, fostering a versatile approach to problem-solving in software development. By viewing challenges as opportunities for innovation, you can enhance your creativity and adaptability.

Choose the Right Programming Language

Selecting the appropriate programming language is essential for the success of your projects. Each language has its strengths and weaknesses, suited for different types of tasks. For example, while Python excels in ease of use and is great for inference tasks, it may face deployment challenges on Windows. On the other hand, Rust shines in performance-critical environments, especially when working with multi-threading. Understanding the nuances of each language empowers you to make informed decisions tailored to your project’s requirements.

Evaluate Language Ecosystems

When choosing a programming language, consider its ecosystem and community support, as these factors can significantly impact your development experience. For instance, Go offers a practical ecosystem for building simple CLI tools, despite its syntax limitations. Additionally, languages like Swift and Swift UI provide deep integration with macOS, making them ideal for building native applications. Understanding the ecosystem surrounding each language helps you leverage existing resources, libraries, and tools to enhance productivity.

Experiment with New Technologies

Continuously experimenting with new programming languages and technologies is vital for growth as a developer. Engaging with different tools not only broadens your skill set but also keeps you updated with industry trends. For example, exploring alternative languages like Rust can offer insights into performance optimization that can be beneficial in various projects. By dedicating time to learn and experiment, you cultivate a habit of lifelong learning, which is essential in the ever-evolving tech landscape.

Seek Guidance and Embrace Collaboration

As a developer, you’re bound to encounter challenges, particularly when learning new languages or technologies. Embracing collaboration and seeking guidance from peers can accelerate your learning process. Don’t hesitate to ask for help; the developer community is often very supportive. Engaging with others can provide different perspectives and solutions, enhancing your problem-solving abilities. Remember, everyone was once a beginner, and sharing experiences can strengthen your knowledge and skills.

Questions & Answers

What mindset shift did the speaker encourage among iOS engineers?

The speaker encouraged iOS engineers to recognize themselves as builders capable of transferring their skills to new domains.

Which programming language does the speaker prefer for simple CLI tools?

The speaker prefers Go for simple CLI tools due to its favorable ecosystem and garbage collection features, despite not liking its syntax.

What does the speaker think about the future of programming languages in relation to AI?

The speaker speculated on whether we need languages specifically designed for agents, as existing languages cater primarily to human needs.

What experience did the speaker share regarding Swift and Swift UI?

The speaker shared their experience using Swift and Swift UI for building Mac apps, highlighting the need for deep system integration and performance differences compared to electron apps.

What are the speaker's views on Python for inference tasks?

The speaker noted that Python is a great choice for inference tasks but mentioned its deployment limitations on Windows as a drawback.

Which programming language does the speaker recommend for performance, especially with multiple threads?

The speaker recommends Rust as a better option for performance, particularly when dealing with multiple threads.

How does the speaker view the choice of programming languages?

The speaker believes there is no definitive answer to which programming language to choose; it depends on the specific problem domain, allowing developers to select the best fit for their needs.

Summary of Timestamps

Attending iOS conferences helped highlight the importance of viewing ourselves as builders rather than just iOS engineers. This shift in mindset encourages developers to apply their skills in broader contexts, fostering innovation and adaptability in various domains.
During discussions on programming languages, I expressed a preference for Go when creating simple CLI tools. Despite my reservations about its syntax, I appreciate its strong ecosystem and effective garbage collection, which make it a practical choice for many developers looking to improve efficiency.
We explored the future of programming languages, particularly in relation to artificial intelligence and autonomous agents. This raises intriguing questions about the need for languages tailored specifically for agentic environments, contrasting with traditional languages that primarily serve human developers.
My experience with Swift and Swift UI in building Mac applications illustrated the importance of deep system integration. This approach contrasts sharply with the performance of Electron apps, underlining how language choice significantly impacts application efficiency and user experience.
When it comes to performance-critical projects, especially involving multiple threads, Rust emerges as a superior option, whereas Python shines in simpler Windows applications despite facing deployment challenges. The choice of programming language truly depends on the specific needs of the project, showcasing the diverse ecosystems available to developers.

Related Summaries